 |
K11 Owners Group K11 Owners Group
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Das Boot Flying Brick Rider

Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 458 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:09 pm Post subject: Gear Oil |
|
|
I don't know how many people belong to the MOA and get their magazine, but there was an interesting article by Paul Glaves on page 28 of the Jan 08 magazine. Glaves suggests that 75w140 gear oil is actually only to be used in transmissions and not in final drives. In doing some research today, I have to admit, I think he is correct. The gear oil recommended by BMW is the GL5 80/90 or 75/90!!! Not the 75/140 that many of us have been using!!! The original containers of BMW's 75/140 oil use to have the gears of a 5 speed transmission and now have a picture of a cockpit view of an R1100S which is kind of wierd now too. Anyway the descriptions of the GL5 80/90 states for use in transmissions, rear axles and final drives. The 75/140 description, which is made by the same company "Spectro" does NOT suggest use in the final drives.
I have used Mobil1 75/140 and the BMW/Spectro 75/140 in both my transmission and final drive for nearly 10 years now without incident. But it makes me wonder if I have been doing the right thing.
Another side note in his article covers hydraulic clutch fluid. I know for a fact one of my local dealers but in the newer Mineral Oil, in for a friend of mine's 2002 K1200RS. The stock used brake fluid, the dealer thought the mineral oil was a later retrofit, it's NOT!!! The communication with dealers and BMW leaves a lot to be desired. _________________ Dom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Das Boot Flying Brick Rider

Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 458 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I forgot to mention, by freinds owners manual for his 2002 K1200RS suggests GL5 gear oil in the final drive. If I remember correctly, BMW started selling their 75/140 gear oil around 1998. _________________ Dom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
acftfliehr Big Brick Rider
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yikes!!!
Got to change out the oil now if not sooner!!!
Thanks for the research and enlightenment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lostboy
Joined: 19 Dec 2007 Posts: 5 Location: MD
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:05 am Post subject: Transmission Oil |
|
|
I seriously doubt any rear drive failures have been caused by using 75W140 instead of 80W90. This is just another case of trying to find a scapegoat instead of the real problem. 75W140 manufactured by both of BMW's oil suplliers has been used for years without any trouble. Large numbers of RDU failures only began with the advent of K1100LT and then other models in the same vintage.
It is my opinion that these failures have two possible causes: either the RDU was assembled with too much preload (very likely given BMW's present quality control) or defective bearings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Das Boot Flying Brick Rider

Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 458 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:16 pm Post subject: Re: Transmission Oil |
|
|
| lostboy wrote: | I seriously doubt any rear drive failures have been caused by using 75W140 instead of 80W90. This is just another case of trying to find a scapegoat instead of the real problem. 75W140 manufactured by both of BMW's oil suplliers has been used for years without any trouble. Large numbers of RDU failures only began with the advent of K1100LT and then other models in the same vintage.
It is my opinion that these failures have two possible causes: either the RDU was assembled with too much preload (very likely given BMW's present quality control) or defective bearings. |
Lost,
The problem first reared its ugly head from the R100GS, which was the first bike to have used the Paralever, which came out in 1987. The 100GS came out several years earlier then the K1100LT and the 11LT does not have anywhere near the failures of the 100GS.
Secondly, neither I nor Mr. Paul Glaves are suggesting all the rear drive problems are from not using BMW's specified GL5 oil. Glaves, myself and many others have also suggested the 'paralever' bearings are junky as well and have suggested Tom Cutter's bushing type instead.
In addition, I mentioned in my orginal post that BMW has infact been contracting out the 75/140 gear oil by Spectro for around 10 years. However, it is not suggested by BMW for use in the final drives, in any owners manual's nor even on the container of the oil itself. The GL5 oil container says for use in final drives. In addition, models produced 10 years after BMW starting using the 75/140 oil still suggest using the GL5 80/90 gear oil.
I will be one of the first to suggest that BMW has been on a slow downward slide and has made plenty of mistakes. Many of the orginal drive problems were due to the wimpy grease used on the splines as well, the infamous BMW Red Grease that they suggested was not dependable and many started to use Honda Moly 60 before BMW came out with another grease to replace the RED stuff for that application.
A few of us on this site have used 15wt fork oil with incident. However, the manual suggest's either 7.5 or 10wt oil. Does that make us wrong? I suggest not, it's simply not suggested by BMW. _________________ Dom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
max Flying Brick Rider
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 309 Location: NZ
|
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Been running the 80/140 GL5 Valvoline in the gearbox & rear drive this last month, over some large (for me) touring distances... and the rear drive was definitely hotter to the touch (as in "oops, is that safe to keep the hand on?") compared to the old 80/90 GL5 I had in before... I'm wondering if the extra viscosity is counterproductive in the rear drive, eg throwing the oil out like a centrifuge and the viscosity is keeping it there, rather than entering back into the gear faces? (Also remembering that the K series drives spin the crownwheel up-and-over before they reengage with the pinion).
I've got more 80/90 and will be using that again in the final drive (with a good dob of moly CV joint grease for extra EP (extreme pressure) protection; the gearbox is better, but it has a deeper pool of oil, and contra-rotating shafts to ensure oil is always present...
Final thought: the old K100 drives did run cooler, probably because they had the whole swingarm as a heatsink, and the whole inner pipe of the driveshaft to conduct heat out of the pinion. Maybe heat expansion in the paralever setups (at the level of finesse the pinions require for setting up, it's possible) contributes to the wear scenarios?
Max |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|