View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
552255 Mad Brick Rider
Joined: 13 Aug 2010 Posts: 94 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:49 pm Post subject: RS front rim on an LT...lower clearance? |
|
|
Just got a RS front rim for my LT...and measured the diameter difference as best i could (estimate). Looks like about the full inch loss, 18" to 17" etc., (both have rubber, one mounted on bike of course)
Recall seeing someone had an accurate size comparison for the rear wheels (a negligible dia. difference)...i'm a bit concerned about ground clearance/peg height with the switch. (I've lowered my footpegs a good 1-3/8" and never really scraped them, come close tho')...maybe i should'nt switch front rims to the 17"?
any thoughts appreciated-
Eric
-- I have already got a RS rear rim on, like it lots! _________________ 1997 K1100LT-SE
1996 K1100RS-SE
"Black & Silver Duo"
Lincoln, NE |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SugarHillCTD Site Admin

Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 4238 Location: Now in Eastern Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eric,
Keep in mind that the the loss is actually 1/2" (ground to center of the axle) at the front wheel.
Also if the rear is unchanged, the loss at the footpegs that you are concerned with will be even less- here's why....
When the front axle is lowered, the effect is greatly lessened as you approach the rear wheel. Example- take a 2x4- 8' long. Lift one end up by 1/2". Halfway along the length the lift is only 1/4"
and your pegs are closer to the rear wheel than the front, further lessening the effect.
Did I make sense? (I think my reasoning is correct?)
Others should add to this or tell me I'm nuts
Good luck!
John _________________ John & Cathy
'92 K100RS4V Pearl White SOLD
'04 K1200GT
IBA Several-SS1k, BBG, 50CC NYC to S.F. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Marvin Rider in the Sky
Joined: 03 Apr 2003 Posts: 1389 Location: El Paso, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
SugarHillCTD wrote: |
Others should add to this or tell me I'm nuts |
OK, John, you're nuts! But I still like both you and Cathy _________________ Ride Safe,
Phil Marvin in El Paso, TX
'94 K75A/3
'95 K75RTP |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
552255 Mad Brick Rider
Joined: 13 Aug 2010 Posts: 94 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Absotively, it should'nt be that much difference, although tire dimension differences could have an effect?...i'm running PR2's now...suppose its again negligible. Thanks! _________________ 1997 K1100LT-SE
1996 K1100RS-SE
"Black & Silver Duo"
Lincoln, NE |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mtnroads Flying Brick Rider

Joined: 29 Mar 2005 Posts: 281 Location: West Linn, OR
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
When you do that it will steepen the fork rake, reducing trail and having some effect on front wheel caster. This will create slightly quicker steering and could conceivably even lead to some of the bar wobble seen in bikes like the ST1100 and ST1300 due to their steep rake. What happens there is if you take your hands off the bars when decelerating down through roughly 40-50mph the handlebars will actually start to oscillate rapidly like a shopping cart wheel. Ask me how I know.
I run the wider RS rear wheel on my LT but think dropping a half inch off the radius of the front wheel is a bit much - it might work fine but you are messing with the original engineering geometries at that point. That said, it's just my opinion and I know some have done it. _________________ 2012 R1200RT Midnight Blue
95 K1100LT Graphit (sold)
01 R1100RT Black (sold) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BobZ(IL) Rider in the Sky

Joined: 20 May 2007 Posts: 651 Location: Bourbonnais, IL
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand why owners have changed the rear wheel when converting to radials, but I've never heard of anyone changing the front wheel
A recent copy of Consumer Motorcycle News explained trail and rake changes and their effects. You may want to take a look. _________________ '93 K1100LT
'78 R100S
'05 R1200GS
BMWMOA, CRBMWOA, ABC, K11OG #997
Live well, do good work, enjoy the ride. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gladstone Brick Rider
Joined: 20 Sep 2008 Posts: 48 Location: Pewsey, Wiltshire, UK
|
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've run both RS wheels on my LT and it transforms the bike. Only downside is that the smaller sized front and slightly smaller rear makes a big difference getting it onto the main stand. However, the sidestand lean is much more reasonable!
The improvement in handling massively outweighs the hernia-inducing centre-stand issue...
Cheers _________________ 1993 K1100LT (x2!)
1998 R1100R - gone
1994 R1100GS - gone
1990 K100RS 16V - gone |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
robert85
Joined: 25 Oct 2011 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you are looking for anyone replaced in their motorcycle (and other) cables and You can do this yourself then you wanna only accessory.You can purchase from here : http://www.motorcycleparts-hornig.com/ . I have also purchased from here for my BMW K1200S.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Number 6 Flying Brick Rider

Joined: 05 Feb 2011 Posts: 481 Location: Paris area, France
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
gladstone wrote: | I've run both RS wheels on my LT and it transforms the bike. Only downside is that the smaller sized front and slightly smaller rear makes a big difference getting it onto the main stand. However, the sidestand lean is much more reasonable!
The improvement in handling massively outweighs the hernia-inducing centre-stand issue...
Cheers |
You need to remove the bushes between the center stand and the gearbox, the RS don't have them. _________________ I am not a number, I am a free man.
94 K1100LT |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PHIL1601UK Big Brick Rider

Joined: 01 May 2007 Posts: 64 Location: Bristol, UK
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Out of interest I swapped both wheels on my LT for the RS wheels and the net effect as already stated is that the front is effectively lowered by half an inch which causes the bike to want to turn in a bit more, but it's manageable. No issues getting the bike on the centrestand but the bonus is that the bike is much more stable at speed (100mph +) - no unsteadiness. Thee is a bit of noise from the front radial but I did 1800 miles on them through France and into Spain and the handling has been transformed.
I also recalibrated the speedo - 80mph on the clock is 82mph - that's about as close as I can get it. _________________
1996 Aspen Silver K1100LTSE - acquired 23/03/07 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|