| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
lexxol Brick Rider
Joined: 20 Mar 2009 Posts: 39 Location: Venice Fl
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:57 am Post subject: Early k75 triple trees, late triple trees ? |
|
|
I would like to put a later triple tree and forks on a early k75. Anyone know the difference between the early and late trees or what problems I would run into?
Thanks in advance _________________ 1995 K1100rs
1987 k75/Pichler fairing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flying Duck PsyKotic Waterfowl

Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 10102 Location: Bumf***, WA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
How late? In 92 they switched to Showa forks. Those have a different diamater so you'd need to get the corresponding fork trees as well. And you'd probably have to redo the brake plumbing as those later bikes did not have the brake plumbing going through the steering head and I don't think the fork trees for the Showas will accommodate that.
I'd recommend getting some of the 91 or earlier "S" forks with progressive springs. _________________ 93 LT (x2)
94 RS
86-97 K75F(K75/100/1100 Frankenbrick)
86 K75C w/paralever, hi perf cams,TURBO!
91 & 92 K75Ss
91 K1
86 custom K100
14 WR250R
IBA #17739 (SS1K, BBG, 50CC)
Buy parts HERE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lexxol Brick Rider
Joined: 20 Mar 2009 Posts: 39 Location: Venice Fl
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Which models have S forks? _________________ 1995 K1100rs
1987 k75/Pichler fairing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flying Duck PsyKotic Waterfowl

Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 10102 Location: Bumf***, WA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
90 and 91. You can identify them by the S stamped in the metal fork cap under the plastic fork cap.
And be sure to read the fork oil quantity write-up by Brain Curry over at IBMWR:
http://www.ibmwr.org/ktech/fork-oil.shtml _________________ 93 LT (x2)
94 RS
86-97 K75F(K75/100/1100 Frankenbrick)
86 K75C w/paralever, hi perf cams,TURBO!
91 & 92 K75Ss
91 K1
86 custom K100
14 WR250R
IBA #17739 (SS1K, BBG, 50CC)
Buy parts HERE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veesquared
Joined: 28 Jan 2010 Posts: 11 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Flying Duck wrote: | 90 and 91. You can identify them by the S stamped in the metal fork cap under the plastic fork cap.
And be sure to read the fork oil quantity write-up by Brain Curry over at IBMWR:
http://www.ibmwr.org/ktech/fork-oil.shtml |
I have to disagree with Flying Duck on this one. I think it's worth putting the Showas on and here is why . Pre 92 forks on the K75 's had a major fault and that was the the stanchion rubbed directly on the lower . After awhile the stanchion wears the the lower leg in a fore and aft fashion like an oval. This means that the axle is now free to oscillate under braking conditions, sometimes so badly that if you peer down at the axle you can visibly see it moving rapidly fore and aft .
Why are the Showas better?. Because they are designed with two teflon, replaceable bushings which wear before the lower leg does. This does three things . Teflon is slippery so the friction or stiction is reduced. The fork is more " accurate". Better steering. Better damper rod design for better bump control.
Brake lines are easily assembled. The Marzocchis were 41.5 mm and the Showas are 41 mm . The triple clamp from the Marzocchi will not really pinch the 41mm stanchion well enough. I have seen complete front ends recently from Beemerboneyard for under 400.00 and IBMWR and Ebay . Considering that just a new lower leg is close to 400.00, You can make a great upgrade here .
Just my .02 cents Sorry, Flying Duck No harm meant . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flying Duck PsyKotic Waterfowl

Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 10102 Location: Bumf***, WA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Somebody else told me the "S" forks were better. I don't care and my feelings aren't hurt. I'm building a K75 a K1100 front end so that I can have a K75 that has better brakes. _________________ 93 LT (x2)
94 RS
86-97 K75F(K75/100/1100 Frankenbrick)
86 K75C w/paralever, hi perf cams,TURBO!
91 & 92 K75Ss
91 K1
86 custom K100
14 WR250R
IBA #17739 (SS1K, BBG, 50CC)
Buy parts HERE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lrome48 Flying Brick Rider
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 364 Location: Northridge, SFV,Southern California
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Flying Duck wrote: | | Somebody else told me the "S" forks were better. I don't care and my feelings aren't hurt. I'm building a K75 a K1100 front end so that I can have a K75 that has better brakes. |
I use the K75 S forks because they are the only model (Brembo) that can be internally shortened and valved for better rebound and compression damping and remain compliant. The S forks offer superior performance, the shortening relocates the friction zone as well, and are slightly stouter. For normal riding and better wear the Showa's are fine; for tunability and performance and customization the Brembos are the ticket, and can be set up for very comfortable riding.
My .02 pfennig.
Larry _________________ Larry
K75
97 K1100 LT Specialk under construction
87 SpecialK75 Carols done!
2004 K12 Special the 'Beast' delivered
K1100 Standard Custom Gone but not forgotten |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lexxol Brick Rider
Joined: 20 Mar 2009 Posts: 39 Location: Venice Fl
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[
I use the K75 S forks because they are the only model (Brembo) that can be internally shortened and valved for better rebound and compression damping and remain compliant. The S forks offer superior performance, the shortening relocates the friction zone as well, and are slightly stouter. For normal riding and better wear the Showa's are fine; for tunability and performance and customization the Brembos are the ticket, and can be set up for very comfortable riding.
My .02 pfennig.
Larry[/quote]
Where can I find more info on this procedure. Sounds interesting. _________________ 1995 K1100rs
1987 k75/Pichler fairing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|